Disaster Recovery as a Governance System
Disaster recovery is often discussed as if it were mainly a technical discipline. Build the standby environment, configure replication, document failover, test the process, and the job is largely done. If the primary system fails, the recovery target takes over. The topic is framed as one of topology, tooling, replication, and automation.
All of those things matter. None of them answers the hardest operational question: when should recovery actually be invoked?
That question sounds deceptively simple. In practice it sits at the center of many recovery failures. Not because the standby is missing, or because replication was not configured, but because the organization has not defined who is allowed to decide, what evidence they should rely on, how much automation should act without human approval, and what record should exist after the decision is made.
The technical problem of recovery is usually visible. The governance problem often stays hidden until...
Copyright of this story solely belongs to hackernoon.com. To see the full text click HERE
