Ancient ‘Who owns Linux?’ case now has one foot very deep in the grave

https://image.theregister.com/260653.jpg?imageId=260653&x=0&y=0&cropw=100&croph=100&panox=0&panoy=0&panow=100&panoh=100&width=1200&height=683

Appeals court upholds decision the case is dead, but Xinuos is trying for a long-shot re-hearing

The long legal battle over ownership of Linux is closer than ever to ending, after a panel of three judges ruled a claim against IBM and Red Hat isn’t valid, and that time has expired for further action.

This story starts in 1998 when IBM decided the world needed a single version of UNIX capable of running on multiple processor architectures. To make that happen, Big Blue allied with a company called the Santa Cruz Operation (SCO) which made a version of UNIX for x86 CPUs. Intel and Sequent also signed up for the multi-architecture effort, called “Project Monterey.”

The alliance didn’t work, largely because Linux came along and delivered a *Nix that ran on multiple processors (and introduced a new way to develop software).

IBM decided to add some of the code developed...

Copyright of this story solely belongs to theregister.com. To see the full text click HERE