Aligning the model was never going to govern it
Most AI roadmaps rest on a quiet bet: that the labs will eventually ship a model safe and aligned enough to simply trust in production. Better training, better guardrails, one more version, and the thing behaves.
Here is the flaw in that bet. Even a perfectly aligned model cannot tell you who used it, on what data, under whose policy, or hand you a record you could show an auditor. Those are not facts about how the model behaves.
They are facts about how it was deployed, and they live entirely outside the weights. A better model answers a different question than the one regulators, auditors, and security teams are actually asking, and the gap between those two questions is where the real risk now sits.
Security engineering named this trap fifty years ago. A 1972 US Air Force study defined the reference monitor, the component that decides whether...
Copyright of this story solely belongs to thenextweb.com. To see the full text click HERE
