When AI Talks About Iran, Where Are the Iranians?

Sanctions hurt civilians, but grammar calls it pressure.

Artificial intelligence does not need to hate anyone to reproduce political blindness.

It only needs to summarize the world the way the world is usually written.

That is the problem.

Ask an AI system to explain Iran, and the answer will usually sound reasonable. It may mention nuclear risk, regional escalation, proxy groups, sanctions, security concerns, diplomacy, and economic hardship. The tone will probably be cautious. It will not sound openly hostile. It will not sound like propaganda. It will sound balanced.

But balance at the level of tone is not the same as balance at the level of grammar.

Iran will often appear as something that acts: Iran threatens, Iran escalates, Iran supports, Iran defies, Iran advances, Iran destabilizes. Sanctions, by contrast, will often appear as something that exists: sanctions remain in place, restrictions affect the economy, pressure continues, hardship increases,...

Copyright of this story solely belongs to hackernoon.com. To see the full text click HERE