Stablecoins and Swift Are Not Competing for the Same Thing
The framing of stablecoins versus SWIFT is wrong, and it has been wrong since the conversation started. The two systems are not solving the same problem. One is a messaging protocol. The other is a settlement layer. Conflating them makes it harder to understand what is actually changing in cross-border payments, and why the change is slower than the hype suggests.
SWIFT moves instructions. It is a standardized messaging network that tells banks what to do with money. The money itself moves through correspondent banking relationships, pre-funded accounts sitting at partner institutions in each currency corridor. When you send money internationally, SWIFT carries the message; the actual settlement happens on the banking rails underneath it, which stop on weekends, close on holidays, and take two to three days to finalize.
That settlement lag is the real bottleneck. And it has a cost that most coverage ignores.
The dead capital problem
...
Copyright of this story solely belongs to hackernoon.com. To see the full text click HERE
