Judge Dismisses Lawsuits Claiming Google's AI Overviews Siphon Web Traffic

Google may have a monopoly in search, but neither lawsuit made a compelling case the company was leveraging it.

Hapabapa/Getty Images

A federal judge has dismissed lawsuits from publisher Penske Media Corporation (PMC) and ed tech company Chegg that alleged Google's AI Overviews illegally pulled readers away by repackaging their online content, Reuters reports. In a memorandum opinion on both lawsuits, Judge Amit Mehta, coincidentally the same judge who ruled that Google maintained a monopoly in online search services in 2024, said the companies failed to argue the search provider violated antitrust laws.

PMC and Chegg's original lawsuits claimed that Google was using AI Overviews and its vast index of the web to siphon traffic away from their online ad businesses, hurting their revenue. Chegg additionally said that Google was effectively forcing websites to offer their content up for AI scraping or face being excluded from search results.

Judge...

Copyright of this story solely belongs to www.engadget.com. To see the full text click HERE