Half of adults admit they would publish work created mainly by AI and not say so — despite believing other people…
- Over two-thirds (69%) of people believe AI generated material can be presented as their own work if they provided the prompt and approved the final version
- Meanwhile, 54% believe AI-based work should be clearly marked
- 7,200 adults were surveyed, located across the US, the European Union, the UK, and Latin America
A growing disparity in how AI generated content, tasks, and tools are assigned ownership and expectations on accurately marking their origins is emerging, according to a new survey by Use.AI.
Furthermore, the findings indicate an emerging dichotomy between human-claimed authorship of an AI work and clear labeling of the work as AI.
Different attitudes based on settings for the AI work have also been identified, such as private emails and school or professional reports.
The chicken or the prompt?
The developing adoption of AI appears to be introducing new attitudes to acceptable creativity, with the emerging model of what...
Copyright of this story solely belongs to techradar.com. To see the full text click HERE
