Google’s top hacker hunter explains why hacking groups get codenames

https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GettyImages-1337404394.jpg?resize=1200,800

For more than a decade, the cybersecurity industry has been assigning names to different hacking groups. Some of them, like Fancy Bear, have crossed over into the mainstream because of their prominent hacks and memorable names. Others are only known within the cybersecurity industry.

Oftentimes, even industry insiders can’t keep track. In part, that’s because every company names hacking groups differently. That’s why there are resources like this one, which attempt to be a one-stop shop where cybersecurity professionals, government officials, policymakers, journalists, and the wider public can make sense of who is who.

Last month, Google became the latest company to revamp its naming system for hacking groups.

Gone are the days APT1, APT41 or APT whatever number, which was the system adopted by Mandiant, once an independent security firm that’s now part of Google. Mandiant was the first to adopt a naming scheme.

From now...

Copyright of this story solely belongs to techcrunch.com. To see the full text click HERE

Read more

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/U8FDQjAxYmygvFzXAoLXzK-1920-80.jpg

'The next generation won’t replace this one so much as sit on top of it' — Industry analysts say Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo's 'relentless push for higher-end performance will need to be moderated' to avoid $1000 launch consoles

* Several industry analysts say Sony and Microsoft may need to scale back their "relentless push for higher-end performance" to avoid $1000 consoles * Piers Harding-Rolls at Ampere Analysis says ambitions will need to be "moderated" to avoid breaching the hefty price point * Rhys Elliott at Alinea Analytics