Can You Trace an AI Decision Back to the Data That Created It?

https://hackernoon.imgix.net/images/sfkHHEMwQdOIo2sOwx8ndjOQUAw1-nf93nbe.png

A walk backward through data, context, and reasoning — and why most enterprise AI systems can't survive the trip.

I've spent over a decade building enterprise data and analytics platforms — the kind that sit underneath dashboards, reports, and, increasingly, AI-driven recommendations at large organizations. A few years ago, on a healthcare analytics program, I watched a readmission-risk model quietly flag a batch of patients as low-risk who had no business being scored that way.

The answer wasn't in the model. It was buried four layers back, in a semantic layer metric that had silently drifted after an upstream schema change nobody flagged. And finding it meant walking backward through a chain most enterprise teams never bother to map: data → context → reasoning → recommendation → action.

This is the story of that walk, and why I think every team shipping AI-driven decisions — especially ones built on top...

Copyright of this story solely belongs to hackernoon.com. To see the full text click HERE

Read more

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Z6WfFMZrxS7H2WSQ8ZCKEA-1920-80.jpg

Fool's Theory says the biggest 'challenge' developing Songs of the Past was making sure Dandelion's story didn't 'steal the show' since The Witcher 3 is about Geralt — 'There was a very big effort put into this fine balancing of the narrative'

* CD Projekt Red and Fool's Theory say there were narrative challenges when developing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt- Songs of the Past * The expansion is about Dandelion, but they didn't want him to "steal the show" from Geralt * There was also "pressure"