AI Hacks Leave a Mess That AI Companies Aren’t Paying For

https://media.wired.com/photos/6ad00a8917414371d605a797/191:100/w_1280,c_limit/Model-Behavior-Cybersecurity-Experts-Discuss-AI-Threats-Business.jpg

When Philadelphia police criticized Anthropic last week for submitting a false tip about an unsolved murder, I thought it might become one of the first cases where an AI company faced legal consequences for misconduct by their agents.

The incident occurred on July 18, when Anthropic said it was testing its Claude Haiku 4.5 model’s ability to perform “example tasks on randomly selected webpages.” The model was instructed not to “submit anything destructive,” and yet, Claude filed a tip to police looking for information about an ongoing murder investigation. “I recall seeing someone matching the description in the area … during that time period,” Claude wrote. The submission, which didn’t include a name or contact information, landed in a spam folder, and officers didn’t review it until Anthropic discovered the gaffe on September 28 and notified the department October 7.

Knowingly providing fictitious information about a crime to police...

Copyright of this story solely belongs to www.wired.com. To see the full text click HERE