A court just ruled that training an AI on someone else's editorial work isn't fair use
Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years.
TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust.
What just happened? The Third Circuit has ruled that Ross Intelligence infringed Thomson Reuters' copyrights by using Westlaw headnotes to train a legal research system designed to compete with Westlaw. The decision gives a federal appeals court's perspective on a question that has become central to the AI industry: when does training a system on copyrighted material qualify as protected fair use, and when does it amount to unauthorized copying for a competing product?
Ross developed an AI-based legal research platform that allowed lawyers to submit legal questions and receive relevant passages from court opinions. To train the system, the company worked with a third party, LegalEase Solutions, to create training materials that connected legal questions with passages from judicial opinions.
The material included Westlaw headnotes. Headnotes are brief summaries written by Westlaw...
Copyright of this story solely belongs to www.techspot.com. To see the full text click HERE